Redmi Note 14 (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 14 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 50/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5110); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 668,462); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 14 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 14 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 190g vs 230g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5110 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 14 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 41 points higher (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (99/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 14 (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 5110 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 14 (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 14 (China) by 84.3% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (99/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 14 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 14 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.