Redmi Note 14 (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Note 14 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 50/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5110); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 668,462); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 14 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 14 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5110 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 14 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 37 points higher (87/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (93/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 14 (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 5110 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 14 (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Note 14 (China) by 79.6% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (93/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) by 37 points (87/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 14 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 14 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.