Redmi Note 14 (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 14 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 31/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5110); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 806,012); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 14 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 14 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) by 53 points (84/100 vs 31/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Performance 1
Display 100
Camera 27
Battery 45
Design 62
Value for money 55
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 97
Display 100
Camera 74
Battery 86
Design 16
Value for money 55
What makes Redmi Note 14 (China) better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 227g

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 16/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 806012
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2398
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5110 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 27/100)
  • Longer battery life (86/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 14 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 53 points higher (84/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (97/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (74/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (86/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (62/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Redmi Note 14 (China): The Redmi Note 14 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 14 (China) Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 806012 4602290
Geekbench Single 1061 3640
Geekbench Multi 2398 11033
Display 6.7" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5110 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2100 nits 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 190 g 227 g
Price $799
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 14 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
  • Front: 16MP
27
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 14 (China)
  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 14 (China)
  • 5110 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
86
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 14 (China) and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 14 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
31/100
806012 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +82.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 14 (China) by 82.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (97/100 vs 1/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (74/100 vs 27/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (86/100 vs 45/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (62/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) by 53 points (84/100 vs 31/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 14 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 27/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 1/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 14 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.