Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $300 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 561,729); the Redmi Note 13 Pro is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Redmi Note 13 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $950
- Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 561729
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1193
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2693
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 50/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 Pro — 52/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 13 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (96/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 561729 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1193 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2693 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.2×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $950 |
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro by 86.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $650. Redmi Note 13 Pro was $650 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (99/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 13 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (96/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.