Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $300 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 55/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 561,729); the Redmi Note 13 Pro is noticeably lighter (187g vs 227g).
Redmi Note 13 Pro
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 187g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $799
- Better portability (57/100 vs 35/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 561729
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1193
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2693
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5100 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 50/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 34 points higher (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 Pro — 52/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (99/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (78/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (92/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 Pro | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 561729 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1193 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2693 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.2×8.9 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $799 |
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi Note 13 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro by 87.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $499. Redmi Note 13 Pro was $499 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (99/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (78/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro (92/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro by 34 points (89/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.