Redmi 14C vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Redmi 14C (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $120 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 31/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 358,383); the Redmi 14C is noticeably lighter (204g vs 309g).
Redmi 14C
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 204g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $2899
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1416
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 13/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Redmi 14C vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 38 points higher (69/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Redmi 14C — 44/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 42/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (52/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 14C significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Redmi 14C | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 63 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $120 | $2899 |
Redmi 14C
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi 14C
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 14C
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Redmi 14C and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Redmi 14C by 87.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $2779. Redmi 14C was $2779 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (91/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (70/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C (52/100 vs 13/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi 14C (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 14C significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C by 38 points (69/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi 14C and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi 14C has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 13/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi 14C or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 14C over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Redmi 14C is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.