Poco X6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco X6 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $238 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 60/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,520,690); the Poco X6 Pro is noticeably lighter (186g vs 309g).
Poco X6 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Faster charging: 67W vs 45W
- Lighter: 186g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $238 vs $2899
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1520690
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1239
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4265
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
Comparing the Poco X6 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 9 points higher (69/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X6 Pro leads (76/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X6 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Poco X6 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1520690 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1239 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4265 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.5×74.3×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $238 | $2899 |
Poco X6 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco X6 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X6 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Poco X6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco X6 Pro by 48.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2661. Poco X6 Pro is cheaper by $2661.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (91/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X6 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Poco X6 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X6 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco X6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Poco X6 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco X6 Pro is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.