Poco X6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Poco X6 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $299 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 61/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,939,244 vs 1,604,305); the Poco X6 Pro is noticeably lighter (186g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X6 Pro by 23 points (84/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco X6 Pro

Performance 68
Display 83
Camera 43
Battery 53
Portability 64
Value for money 60

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

What makes Poco X6 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 67W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 186g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $1299

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3939244 vs 1604305
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1239
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 4265
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco X6 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 23 points higher (84/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco X6 Pro — 60/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (97/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).

Poco X6 Pro: The Poco X6 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco X6 Pro Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1604305 3939244
Geekbench Single 1239 3601
Geekbench Multi 4265 10686
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2712x1220 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 67W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) — 157
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / HyperOS Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 160.5×74.3×8.3 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 186 g 214 g
Launch price $299 $1299

Camera comparison

Poco X6 Pro

  • Main: 64MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Poco X6 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Poco X6 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco X6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco X6 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
61/100
1604305 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +59.3%
3939244 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Poco X6 Pro by 59.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco X6 Pro

$299

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $1000. Poco X6 Pro was $1000 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (97/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X6 Pro (86/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco X6 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X6 Pro by 23 points (84/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Poco X6 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco X6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Poco X6 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco X6 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.