Poco M2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco M2 Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 42/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 517,460); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M2 Pro doesn't; the Poco M2 Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco M2 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco M2 Pro better?
- Lighter: 209g vs 230g
- Better portability (45/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 517460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1762
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco M2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 49 points higher (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco M2 Pro is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco M2 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 517460 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco M2 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco M2 Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco M2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco M2 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco M2 Pro by 87.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco M2 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco M2 Pro is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco M2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M2 Pro by 49 points (91/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Poco M2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco M2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco M2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco M2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Poco M2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.