Poco F6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F6 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $390 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,756,020); the Poco F6 Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F6 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco F6 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Lighter: 209g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $390 vs $950
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1756020
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1421
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5166
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 72/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Poco F6 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (99/100 vs 72/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F6 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1756020 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1421 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5166 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×75.0×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $390 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco F6 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F6 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F6 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F6 Pro by 58.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $560. Poco F6 Pro was $560 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (99/100 vs 72/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 72/100).
Should you choose the Poco F6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F6 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.