Poco F6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F6 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $390 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,749,097); the Poco F6 Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).
Poco F6 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Lighter: 209g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $390 vs $950
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1749097
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1421
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5166
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 72/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Poco F6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (99/100 vs 72/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (94/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Poco F6 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1749097 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1421 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5166 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×75.0×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $390 | $950 |
Poco F6 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F6 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F6 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco F6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F6 Pro by 58.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $560. Poco F6 Pro was $560 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (99/100 vs 72/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (96/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro (94/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F6 Pro by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 72/100).
Should you choose the Poco F6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F6 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.