Poco C85 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Poco C85 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $100 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 36/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 346,495); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C85 doesn't; the Poco C85 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C85
Performance 29
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 49
Portability 62
Value for money 56
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Poco C85 better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $950

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 346495
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 420
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1364
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
  • Higher value score: 94/100 vs 56/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C85 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (94/100 vs 56/100).

Poco C85: The Poco C85 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C85 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 346495 4247433
Geekbench Single 420 3640
Geekbench Multi 1364 11033
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 33W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 810 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 173.2×81.1×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Launch price $100 $950
Camera comparison
Poco C85
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Poco C85
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Poco C85
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C85 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C85 MediaTek Helio G85
36/100
346495 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +91.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco C85 by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C85
$100
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $850. Poco C85 was $850 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (99/100 vs 29/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (89/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (85/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (94/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C85 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C85 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco C85 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C85 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Poco C85 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco C85 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.