Poco C75 vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
The Poco C75 (2024) is priced at $116, the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) at $105. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 32/100 vs 25/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Poco C75 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A76 4G doesn't.
Poco C75
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (26/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Cheaper: $105 vs $116
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the Poco C75 scores 7 points higher (32/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Poco C75 | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | — | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | — | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | — | |
| Price | $116 | $105 |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $11. ZTE Blade A76 4G is cheaper by $11.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Poco C75 edges out the ZTE Blade A76 4G by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.