Poco C75 vs ZTE Voyage 40 5G
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (2023) runs on the Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760). By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 32/100 vs 10/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Poco C75 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G doesn't.
Poco C75
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the ZTE Voyage 40 5G, the Poco C75 scores 22 points higher (32/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C75 | ZTE Voyage 40 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Unisoc T7520 (Tanggula T760) | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | — | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 163.6×75.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | — | |
| Price | $116 | — |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Voyage 40 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE Voyage 40 5G by 22 points (32/100 vs 10/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the ZTE Voyage 40 5G — 10/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C75 leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the ZTE Voyage 40 5G?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Voyage 40 5G is a better fit for everyday use.