Poco C75 vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 32/100 vs 22/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco C75 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't.
Poco C75
ZTE V40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5100 mAh
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 65W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 204g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 40/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Poco C75 scores 10 points higher (32/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (37/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (50/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C75 (62/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C75 | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $116 | — |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C75 (62/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C75 is noticeably better than the ZTE V40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The ZTE V40 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.