Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Redmi Note 8

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Redmi Note 8 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665; estimated prices are $1799 and $180. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads — 38/100 vs 17/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has the bigger battery (5015 mAh vs 4000); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,553,009 vs 329,457); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 8 doesn't; the Redmi Note 8 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 258g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 by 21 points (38/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Performance 32
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 42
Design 0
Value for money 0
Redmi Note 8
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 28
Battery 12
Design 62
Value for money 97
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1553009 vs 329457
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 321
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 1128
  • Bigger battery: 5015 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (32/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (31/100 vs 28/100)
  • Longer battery life (42/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Redmi Note 8 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 258g
  • Cheaper: $180 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Redmi Note 8, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold scores 21 points higher (38/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (42/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8 leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Redmi Note 8 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (42/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 8 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (97/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Redmi Note 8: The Redmi Note 8 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Redmi Note 8
Processor Google Tensor G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
AnTuTu 1553009 329457
Geekbench Single 2276 321
Geekbench Multi 6173 1128
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.3" IPS LCD
Resolution 2152x2076 2340x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 30W 18W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 48 MP 48 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 3GB / 4GB / 6GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 32GB / 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 9
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 158.3×75.3×8.4 mm
Weight 258 g 190 g
Price $1799 $180
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
31
camera
Redmi Note 8
  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi Note 8
  • 6.3" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Redmi Note 8
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Redmi Note 8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
38/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
17/100 -371.4%
329457 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads Redmi Note 8 by 371.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
$1799
Redmi Note 8
$180

Price difference: $1619. Redmi Note 8 is cheaper by $1619.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (32/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Redmi Note 8 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (42/100 vs 12/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 8 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (62/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (97/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Redmi Note 8?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 by 21 points (38/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Redmi Note 8?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Redmi Note 8 — 17/100.

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Redmi Note 8?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (32/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Redmi Note 8?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 8 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.