Tecno Pova Neo vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Tecno Pova Neo (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G25, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE V40 Pro leads — 22/100 vs 14/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Neo has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE V40 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 214g).
Tecno Pova Neo
ZTE V40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5100 mAh
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 214g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 45/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Neo vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the ZTE V40 Pro scores 8 points higher (22/100 vs 14/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Neo leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Neo significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Neo | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G25 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 65W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×77.3×9.1 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $130 | — |
Tecno Pova Neo
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE V40 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (62/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Neo significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Neo or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The ZTE V40 Pro edges out the Tecno Pova Neo by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Neo and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Neo has a MobileRank rating of 14/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Neo or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The ZTE V40 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Neo over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.