Poco C75 vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $116 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 32/100 vs 26/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 358,383).
Poco C75
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper: $116 vs $130
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
- Lighter: 192g vs 204g
- Better camera (28/100 vs 26/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Poco C75 scores 6 points higher (32/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Poco C75 are nearly equal (28/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (60/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Poco C75 | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 192 g | |
| Price | $116 | $130 |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C75 and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Poco C75 by 41.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $14. Poco C75 is cheaper by $14.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Poco C75 are nearly equal (28/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (60/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Poco C75 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.