Poco C75 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $116 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 32/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 358,383); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is thinner (4.1mm vs 8.2mm).
Poco C75
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 204g vs 215g
- Cheaper: $116 vs $2199
- Better design/ergonomics (45/100 vs 31/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 60W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 40/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 39 points higher (71/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (64/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C75 is a bit better (45/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Poco C75 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $116 | $2199 |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Poco C75 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Poco C75 by 90.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2083. Poco C75 is cheaper by $2083.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (64/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C75 is a bit better (45/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 39 points (71/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (64/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.