Tecno Pova Neo vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
The Tecno Pova Neo (2022) is priced at $130, the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) at $105. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads — 25/100 vs 14/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Neo has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP.
Tecno Pova Neo
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 36/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper: $105 vs $130
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Neo vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the ZTE Blade A76 4G scores 11 points higher (25/100 vs 14/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Neo | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G25 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×77.3×9.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | — | |
| Price | $130 | $105 |
Tecno Pova Neo
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $25. ZTE Blade A76 4G is cheaper by $25.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (50/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Neo or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Neo — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Neo and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Tecno Pova Neo has a MobileRank rating of 14/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Neo or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Neo over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Tecno Pova Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.