Tecno Spark 20C vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
Comparing the Tecno Spark 20C (2023) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads — 25/100 vs 16/100 (a 9-point difference).
Tecno Spark 20C
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Faster charging: 18W vs 5W
- Overall rating 16/100
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Tecno Spark 20C vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the ZTE Blade A76 4G scores 9 points higher (25/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 20C (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 20C (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Tecno Spark 20C | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 5W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.6×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | $105 |
Tecno Spark 20C
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Tecno Spark 20C
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Spark 20C
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 20C
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 20C (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 20C (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 20C or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G edges out the Tecno Spark 20C by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 20C and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Tecno Spark 20C has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 20C or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 20C over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Tecno Spark 20C is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.