Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy M07
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy M07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M07 leads — 41/100 vs 33/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M07 is faster in AnTuTu (552,286 vs 346,495); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M07 doesn't.
Poco C65
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Overall rating 33/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 552286 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 727 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
- Lighter: 184g vs 192g
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 63/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Samsung Galaxy M07, the Samsung Galaxy M07 scores 8 points higher (41/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 leads (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Samsung Galaxy M07 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 552286 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 184 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C65 and Samsung Galaxy M07, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M07 leads Poco C65 by 37.3% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy M07
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (43/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 edges out the Poco C65 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy M07 — 41/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 leads on performance (43/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for everyday use.