Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy A07
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy A07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $99 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A07 leads — 26/100 vs 25/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A07 is faster in AnTuTu (533,135 vs 262,000); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A07 doesn't.
Poco C65
Samsung Galaxy A07
- Cheaper: $99 vs $120
- Overall rating 25/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 533135 vs 262000
- Better Geekbench Single: 760 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1890 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
- Lighter: 184g vs 192g
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Samsung Galaxy A07, the Samsung Galaxy A07 scores 1 points higher (26/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 is a bit better (70/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Poco C65 | Samsung Galaxy A07 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | 533135 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 184 g | |
| Price | $99 | $120 |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A07
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C65 and Samsung Galaxy A07, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A07 leads Poco C65 by 50.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $21. Poco C65 is cheaper by $21.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 is a bit better (70/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 edges out the Poco C65 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Samsung Galaxy A07 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A07 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.