Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 16/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 153,667); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 224g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 71 points higher (87/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (83/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (68/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 11047 | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 480x854 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 Go | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 158 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | — | $892 |
Camera comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Oscal Flat 3C Mini and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 96.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (98/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (81/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (87/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (83/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (68/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 71 points (87/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Oscal Flat 3C Mini and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Oscal Flat 3C Mini over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.