Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs Xiaomi 18 Fold
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Xiaomi 18 Fold (2026) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads — 86/100 vs 16/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 18 Fold has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 18 Fold is faster in AnTuTu (5,228,014 vs 153,667); the Xiaomi 18 Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C Mini is noticeably lighter (158g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Xiaomi 18 Fold
What makes Oscal Flat 3C Mini better?
- Lighter: 158g vs 219g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Xiaomi 18 Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5228014 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3715 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 14213 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (85/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oscal Flat 3C Mini vs the Xiaomi 18 Fold, the Xiaomi 18 Fold scores 70 points higher (86/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (99/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (85/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (75/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (99/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (79/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (85/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (75/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini and the Xiaomi 18 Fold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oscal Flat 3C Mini | Xiaomi 18 Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A | Xiaomi XRING O3 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 5228014 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 3715 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 14213 | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 7.6" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 480x854 | 1672x2364 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 Go | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP59 | |
| Dimensions | 135.6×70.2×11.1 mm | 159.7×145.1×5.0 mm | |
| Weight | 158 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1639 |
Camera comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x854
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1672x2364
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Oscal Flat 3C Mini and Xiaomi 18 Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 18 Fold leads Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 97.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oscal Flat 3C Mini
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (99/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (79/100 vs 31/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (85/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini (75/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C Mini and the Xiaomi 18 Fold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C Mini by 70 points (86/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Oscal Flat 3C Mini and the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Oscal Flat 3C Mini has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Xiaomi 18 Fold — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold leads on camera score (85/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oscal Flat 3C Mini or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold leads on performance (99/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Oscal Flat 3C Mini over the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.