Oscal Flat 3C vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Oscal Flat 3C (2026) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T310, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $130 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 34/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 32 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C doesn't; the Oscal Flat 3C is noticeably lighter (199g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oscal Flat 3C
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Oscal Flat 3C better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 224g
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $892
- Better portability (50/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (87/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oscal Flat 3C vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 53 points higher (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Oscal Flat 3C — 48/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (87/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oscal Flat 3C | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T310 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.3×76.7×8.9 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $130 | $892 |
Camera comparison
Oscal Flat 3C
- Main: 32MP
- Front: 13MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oscal Flat 3C
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oscal Flat 3C
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $762. Oscal Flat 3C was $762 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (81/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (87/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oscal Flat 3C is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oscal Flat 3C or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C by 53 points (87/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Oscal Flat 3C and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Oscal Flat 3C has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oscal Flat 3C or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 22/100).
Should you choose the Oscal Flat 3C over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.