Oppo Reno9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Oppo Reno9 Pro (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 33/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Oppo Reno9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (35/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (82/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 4 points higher (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads (35/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (35/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (82/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 67W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×73.6×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 174 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (81/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (35/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (82/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Oppo Reno9 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.