Oppo Reno9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Oppo Reno9 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,092,605); the Oppo Reno9 Pro is noticeably lighter (174g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Oppo Reno9 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 67W vs 45W
- Lighter: 174g vs 309g
- Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1092605
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1139
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3842
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 62/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (90/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1092605 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1139 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3842 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×74.2×7.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Oppo Reno9 Pro by 62.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno9 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (90/100 vs 62/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno9 Pro (63/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 62/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.