Oppo Reno7 A vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Oppo Reno7 A (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 23/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP.
Oppo Reno7 A
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno7 A vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 14 points higher (37/100 vs 23/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno7 A leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (81/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno7 A notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno7 A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno7 A | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 () | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.4" Amoled | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | — | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX4 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×73.4×7.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 175 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno7 A
- Main: 48MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Oppo Reno7 A
- 6.4" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno7 A
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 A (81/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno7 A notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (24/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno7 A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (81/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno7 A or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno7 A — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno7 A and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno7 A has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno7 A or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno7 A over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno7 A is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.