Oppo K10 5G (China) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Oppo K10 5G (China) (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 34/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP.
Oppo K10 5G (China)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 40/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Oppo K10 5G (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 3 points higher (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) leads (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo K10 5G (China) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Max | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 67W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.8×8.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 205 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (81/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (48/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Oppo K10 5G (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K10 5G (China) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K10 5G (China) over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.