Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads — 41/100 vs 37/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 4 points higher (41/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 179 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 62/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 62/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.