OPPO Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The OPPO Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $470 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 74/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno16 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes OPPO Reno16 better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $1999
- Better camera (81/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 4106
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 1 points higher (75/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 leads (66/100 vs 39/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2078850 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $470 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads OPPO Reno16 by 32.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1529. OPPO Reno16 was $1529 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (91/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (66/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 edges out the OPPO Reno16 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.