OPPO Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $470 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 74/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno16 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
- Lighter: 188g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $2199
- Better camera (81/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4106
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 3 points higher (77/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 leads (81/100 vs 67/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (64/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2078850 | 3453998 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $470 | $2199 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 by 39.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1729. OPPO Reno16 was $1729 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (96/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (64/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.