OPPO Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
The OPPO Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $470 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 leads — 74/100 vs 73/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,382,020 vs 2,078,850); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
What makes OPPO Reno16 better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 188g vs 201g
- Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $1999
- Better camera (81/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3382020 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4106
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 71/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the OPPO Reno16 scores 1 points higher (74/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 leads (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 leads (66/100 vs 52/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2078850 | 3382020 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1270 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4106 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 123.9×161.4×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $470 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads OPPO Reno16 by 38.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1529. OPPO Reno16 was $1529 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (96/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (81/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (96/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?
The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.