OPPO Reno16 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The OPPO Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $470 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 74/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno16 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16

Performance 71
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 72

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 70

What makes OPPO Reno16 better?

  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Lighter: 188g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 46/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 2078850
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1270
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4106
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 6 points higher (80/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 leads (66/100 vs 56/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (88/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (64/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Reno16: The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2078850 3128552
Geekbench Single 1270 3100
Geekbench Multi 4106 9760
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1216x2640 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 151
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 188 g 218 g
Launch price $470 $1299

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
74/100
2078850 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100 +33.6%
3128552 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 by 33.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16

$470

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $829. OPPO Reno16 was $829 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (92/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 are nearly equal (88/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (64/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.