OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold5
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X Fold5 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $600 and $1160. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 77/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,345,563); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X Fold5
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2345563
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1160
- Better camera (94/100 vs 74/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold5 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2203 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6511 vs 6405
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold5, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 6 points higher (83/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold5 leads (76/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X Fold5 — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 82/100. In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold5 is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold5 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X Fold5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2345563 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP58 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1160 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold5
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X Fold5
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold5
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X Fold5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Vivo X Fold5 by 31.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $560. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $560 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 82/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (94/100 vs 74/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold5 is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold5 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold5?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Vivo X Fold5 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold5?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold5 — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold5?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold5?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.