OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $600 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 80/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,251,381); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2251381
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1499
- Better camera (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2203 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6511 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 3 points higher (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 82/100. In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 36.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $899. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $899 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 82/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.