OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; launch prices were $600 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 62/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,378,803); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 263g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1378803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 263g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1799
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1555
- Overall rating 62/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 21 points higher (83/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 39/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 32/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1378803 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2176x1812 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 124 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 155.1×130.1×6.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 263 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2176x1812
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 123.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1199. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (94/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (66/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 21 points (83/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 62/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users.