OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $661 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 80/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,251,381); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1499
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Overall rating 80/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 7 points higher (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 84/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 34.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $838. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $838 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 84/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.