OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,926,532); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $2899
- Better camera (94/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8932
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 63/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 3.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2238. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $2238 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.