OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,032,039); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 7.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8932
- Lighter: 201g vs 205g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (74/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 23.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (94/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (74/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.