OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 75/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 3,032,039); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 7.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 205g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $1999
- Better camera (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 8932
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 12 points higher (87/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 39/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1338. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $1338 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (83/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.