Oppo Reno16 FS vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 61/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 877,641); the Oppo Reno16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 226g).
Oppo Reno16 FS
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 194g vs 226g
- Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno16 FS vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 26 points higher (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno16 FS | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Oppo Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo Reno16 FS and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno16 FS by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno16 FS
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS by 26 points (87/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16 FS and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno16 FS over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.