OPPO Reno16 FS vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $549 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 879,714); the OPPO Reno16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 FS
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 FS better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $950
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 FS vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 FS — 40/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 FS | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $549 | $950 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 FS and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 FS by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $401. OPPO Reno16 FS was $401 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 FS and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 FS over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.