OPPO Reno16 FS vs Vivo iQOO 16
The OPPO Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $549 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 61/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 879,714); the OPPO Reno16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 FS
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes OPPO Reno16 FS better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $840
- Better portability (58/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 FS vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 28 points higher (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 FS — 40/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (58/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 FS | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $549 | $840 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 FS and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads OPPO Reno16 FS by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $291. OPPO Reno16 FS was $291 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (100/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (90/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (58/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 FS and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The OPPO Reno16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 FS or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 FS over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.