Oppo Reno16 FS vs Vivo X300s

The Oppo Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 61/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 877,641); the Oppo Reno16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno16 FS
Performance 55
Display 80
Camera 64
Battery 58
Portability 58
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Oppo Reno16 FS better?
  • Lighter: 194g vs 217g

  • Better portability (58/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno16 FS vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 28 points higher (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (58/100 vs 42/100).

Oppo Reno16 FS: The Oppo Reno16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Reno16 FS Vivo X300s
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 877641 3703823
Geekbench Single 1011 3228
Geekbench Multi 2813 9553
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2372 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, ColorOS 16 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm
Weight 194 g 217 g
Launch price $723
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno16 FS
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Reno16 FS
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2372
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno16 FS
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno16 FS and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy
61/100
877641 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +76.3%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Oppo Reno16 FS by 76.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno16 FS
Price unknown
Vivo X300s
$723
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (94/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (94/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (83/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (58/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16 FS and the Vivo X300s?

The Oppo Reno16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno16 FS or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno16 FS over the Vivo X300s?

The Oppo Reno16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.