OPPO Reno16 (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $515 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 79/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 (China) has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,120,347); the OPPO Reno16 (China) is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 188g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $515 vs $899
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 9 points higher (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 (China) — 78/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $515 | $899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 (China) by 36.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $384. OPPO Reno16 (China) was $384 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (94/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno16 (China) by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.