Realme GT 8 vs Vivo X300 E
The Realme GT 8 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 E (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $350 and $651. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 E leads — 81/100 vs 80/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 E has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 7000); the Realme GT 8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,068,952).
Realme GT 8
Vivo X300 E
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3068952
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2903
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Cheaper: $350 vs $651
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (98/100 vs 94/100)
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 200g vs 209g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Realme GT 8 vs the Vivo X300 E, the Vivo X300 E scores 1 points higher (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | Realme GT 8 | Vivo X300 E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9602 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3136 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×74.3×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $350 | $651 |
Realme GT 8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 E
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme GT 8
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3136
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 E
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT 8
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 E
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Realme GT 8 and Vivo X300 E, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT 8 leads Vivo X300 E by 1.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $301. Realme GT 8 is cheaper by $301.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (98/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT 8 or the Vivo X300 E?
The Vivo X300 E edges out the Realme GT 8 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT 8 and the Vivo X300 E?
The Realme GT 8 has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 E — 81/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT 8 or the Vivo X300 E?
The Vivo X300 E leads on camera score (64/100 vs 56/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT 8 over the Vivo X300 E?
The Realme GT 8 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 E is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.