Realme GT7 (China) vs Vivo X300 E
The Realme GT7 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+, while the Vivo X300 E (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 E leads — 81/100 vs 71/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 E is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 2,835,794).
Realme GT7 (China)
Vivo X300 E
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Overall rating 71/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 2835794
- Better Geekbench Single: 2903 vs 2729
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 8430
- Lighter: 200g vs 203g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 72/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Realme GT7 (China) vs the Vivo X300 E, the Vivo X300 E scores 10 points higher (81/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E leads (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E leads (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 E and the Realme GT7 (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E notably outperforms the Realme GT7 (China) (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Realme GT7 (China) | Vivo X300 E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2835794 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2729 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8430 | 9602 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×76.0×8.3 mm | 157.5×74.3×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | $651 |
Realme GT7 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 E
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme GT7 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 E
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT7 (China)
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 E
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Realme GT7 (China) and Vivo X300 E, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 E leads Realme GT7 (China) by 7.6% in our overall performance rating.
Realme GT7 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 E and the Realme GT7 (China) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E notably outperforms the Realme GT7 (China) (64/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 E is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT7 (China) or the Vivo X300 E?
The Vivo X300 E is noticeably better than the Realme GT7 (China) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Realme GT7 (China) and the Vivo X300 E?
The Realme GT7 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 E — 81/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT7 (China) or the Vivo X300 E?
The Vivo X300 E leads on camera score (64/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT7 (China) over the Vivo X300 E?
The Realme GT7 (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 E is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.