OPPO Reno 16 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The OPPO Reno 16 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $515 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 79/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,078,850); the OPPO Reno 16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
OPPO Reno 16
Vivo X300 Pro
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $515 vs $899
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2078850
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6403
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 8 points higher (87/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 — 82/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2078850 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $515 | $899 |
OPPO Reno 16
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno 16 by 36.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $384. OPPO Reno 16 was $384 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (93/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno 16 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.