Tecno Pop 7 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pop 7 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 24/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 153,667); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Pop 7 doesn't.
Tecno Pop 7
Vivo X300 Pro
- Overall rating 24/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 9/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pop 7 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 63 points higher (87/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pop 7 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.5×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Tecno Pop 7
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pop 7
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pop 7
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pop 7 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pop 7 by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Pop 7
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (93/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (84/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pop 7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 7 by 63 points (87/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pop 7 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pop 7 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pop 7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pop 7 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pop 7 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.